Hear ye, Hear ye ...
Custer State Park Campground 2nd! Edition
Since writing last week about the 176 campsites to be constructed at the start of the Wildlife Loop, a lot has changed. First off, Gov. Kristi Noem listened to you and has agreed that this is not a good plan. My hat is off to Gov. Noem because she believes in listening to the citizens of South Dakota. Wow! Now that shows the character of this lady.
So, now what? Well, she immediately got her staff in and had them change course. This plan I’m going to lay out was in draft form before the 176, over-the-top plan was surfaced. Here is the new plan.
-First, the 176 campsites at the start of the Wildlife Loop are done; thrown in the trash can so to speak.
-Second, a new plan of 66 units, located next to Stockade Lake, is recommended.
Now, before we throw the baby out with the bathwater, let’s study this a bit. This plan is for 66 campsites with just electricity, no water hookups, for camping. The cost per campsite proposed is $30 per night. The location is 50 acres located in a hay field next to Stockade Lake.
So, where does that put the number of camping spots in Custer State Park? My information is that there are 389 camping sites now in the park. The park has lost sites throughout the years. No, I’m not sure why, but I did find out there were 465 camping sites in 1970. With the proposed 66 sites, that would bring the total sites in Custer State Park to 455 or ten less than 1970.
Does that seem reasonable to you? I think they should all be tent camping sites only. What does that do to the private campgrounds? Currently there are over 14,000 campsites in the Black Hills. Many campground owners are expanding. Of course, this is at their own expense. That’s what private enterprise does. It takes all the risks in hopes of reaping the profits in future years. My view is that profit is not a dirty word.
So, the question we all need to answer for ourselves is: Are 455 camping spots in Custer State Park hurtful economically to the private campgrounds? Some traffic numbers in the park that I found interesting are Custer State Park had 2.3 million visitations in 2021. That was 69,000 more visitations than 2020. The increase in visitations is up 25% over the 9-year average. So, the question here is: are 455 campsites unreasonable?
The next area that might raise some concern is the cost of this project. The figure used was 4.8 million dollars! I was having heart palpitations when the cost was 10 million for 176 campsites. I had a contractor friend of mine ask Game, Fish and Parks to go over some of the costs. Here’s what he came up with. $5000 per electrical box per site. This obviously, so my contractor says, seems very high. His estimate is less than $1000 per site, saving 264K. The cost of a bathhouse with 8 showers each for men and women in the unit, along with flush toilets, was $350,000. You can build a really nice residential home for $350,000 and that includes buying the lot the house sits on. In this case the bathhouse lot is state property, so no cost for the land. My contractor says $175K would be the cost savings.
Next is the engineering required before construction begins. Game, Fish, and Parks cost was $389,000. My contractor stated he had 90 lots for housing engineering done for $150K. His estimate was $150K for the engineering of these 66 campsites saving $239K.
The cost of black-topping one half mile road into the campground is 1.23 million. My contractor says 1 million per mile of blacktop is using the high figure. Remember, if we go with just tent campsites, the weight would be less, leaving less wear and tear on the blacktop. My contractor estimates a cost of 500K, so savings is 800K.
The cost of each camping site my contractor has not done before, so we will leave that one out for now. So, where are we at in savings?
Engineering $239K
Electrical boxes $264K
Bathhouse $175K
Blacktop road $800K
TOTAL $1,478,000
These are rough estimates, but it does help all of us wondering why costs are so high. My contractor stated that if he had the contract for these campsites, he estimates he would profit over 2 million dollars.
What do you want me to do as your representative for this district, district 30, of which Custer State Park is included? Here is my thought. I will propose an amendment to HB-1048 requiring only tent campsites and a maximum cost of $3 million. Please think about this plan and then shoot me an email with your thoughts and/or recommendations.
To the citizens of South Dakota and to the men and women in uniform, in honor of all who served, in respectful memory of all who fell, and in great appreciation to those who serve today, Thank You, for giving me the opportunity to represent you.
Tim R. Goodwin, District 30 Representative

