Amendment A
A bundled medical marijuana, recreational marijuana and hemp.
The one subject rule is outlined in Article XXIII, Section 1 of the South Dakota State Constitution. It reads: “A proposed amendment may amend one or more articles and related subject matter in other articles as necessary to accomplish the objectives of the amendment; however, no proposed amendment may embrace more than one subject.”
Tim, you ask, what are you talking about? As Joe Biden would say, “Come on, man!” Of course, I’m talking about Constitutional Amendment A. Not to say I told you so, but I did write an article on September 15, 2020 alerting all to this ballot measure. In my humble opinion, the only ballot measure that was legitimate was Amendment B-Sports betting in Deadwood.
IM-26 Medical Marijuana was one of three subjects included in Amendment A along with Hemp and Recreational Marijuana. So, if you voted, you voted for or against medicinal marijuana twice. I say again, where is the quality control? How in the world can you vote twice on the same ballot for medicinal marijuana, not to mention that it is already available in the drug Marinol and not to mention that the 2019 legislature passed authorization to grow hemp.
If I’ve got this right, in review, we voted twice on medical marijuana when a product was already legal in South Dakota. We voted on hemp, and the legislature had already passed it.? Really??
So, going back to a single subject for ballot measures. Amendment A bundled medical marijuana, recreational marijuana and hemp. How clever. Want-to-be hemp growers vote yes, people in pain who don’t know about Marinol vote yes AND the citizens who want pot legal vote yes for Amendment A. I’m glad there is a single subject rule, as these ballot measures are confusing enough without bundling 3 items together.
What I should have started off with is that the Pennington County Sheriff and the Secretary of the Highway Patrol have filed a lawsuit saying Amendment A is unconstitutional. Who pays for the legal fees? I’m not sure, but I’d bet it is Pennington County taxpayers and the State of South Dakota, as that is who the Secretary of the Highway Patrol works for. Actually, they both work for all of us, the taxpayers.
Is this where we are at as a citizenry? We throw ballot measures on our election ballot, and then if it passes, we take it to court to see if it is legal. Shoot! My chocolate lab Mocha, who is pretty smart, can see through this one. Where is the quality control before it goes on the ballot???
To the citizens of South Dakota and to the men and women in uniform, in honor of all who served, in respectful memory of all who fell, and in great appreciation to those who serve today, Thank You, for giving me the opportunity to represent you.
Tim R. Goodwin, District 30 Representative

